In the article by Robin Givhan (who also provided crack reporting on the types of scarves worn by Nancy Pelosi on her trip to Syria), she breathlessly writes:
"It was startling to see that small acknowledgment of sexuality and femininity peeking out"
. . .
"The cleavage [was] an exceptional kind of flourish."
. . .
"The cleavage stirs the same kind of discomfort that might be churned up after spotting Rudy Giuliani with his shirt unbuttoned just a smidge too far. No one wants to see that. But really, it was more like catching a man with his fly unzipped. Just look away!"
. . .
"There was the sense that you were catching a surreptitious glimpse at something private. You were intruding -- being a voyeur."
. . .
"To display cleavage in a setting that does not involve cocktails and hors d'oeuvres is a provocation."
I'm not sure whether to feel more embarrassed for Clinton or for the Washington Post.
No comments:
Post a Comment