A study on methane “super emitters” has revealed
something about the scope of the environmental threat represented by
Donald Trump’s refusal to regulate methane release at wells. Not only
are these sources making a significant and often unrecognized
contribution to the climate crisis, but they can be difficult to find.
Methane is invisible and, without the mercaptan added by utility
companies to give gas its distinctive stink, even high levels of the gas
can be odorless. Even when a satellite or plane identifies high methane
in an area, pinpointing a specific well or storage facility is almost
impossible without the kind of monitoring devices that the Trump
Environmental Protection Agency is trying to eliminate.
Or it is almost impossible most of the time. A brand-new paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
shows an example of a single well venting methane in a way that was not
only highly visible, but almost unbelievable. As in, this single well
released more methane in three weeks than most entire nations do in a
year. So much methane that this single well, venting over a period of
about 20 days, may have been a significant contributor to altering the
climate.
This particular super-duper emitter came from a fracking well in Ohio
that blew during development in 2018. The emissions from the well were
so strong that they became almost immediately visible to the
Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument aboard the orbiting Sentinel-5P satellite. What that instrument saw indicated that the well was producing between 100 and 160 tons
of methane every hour. The satellite doesn’t have information for the
full period, but if that rate continued over the 20 days before the well
was capped, one Ohio blowout released more methane into the atmosphere
over that period than either Germany or the U.K. released during all of
2018.
And this staggering, potentially world-altering in a very literal
way event went more or less unnoticed. If it weren’t for the new
instrument, and images taken both before and during the venting event,
there would have been no way to quantify just how horrible a single well
blowout can be, and how significant these events really are when
compared to the amount of methane lost from pipelines, tanks, and in
normal use.
The authors of the paper use this incident to point out the
effectiveness of their space-based instrument, and it certainly is
effective. But it also reinforces the need to maintain monitors on each well,
and to recognize the fantastic threat generated through fracking by
levying massive penalties against companies who fail to regulate
emissions.
No comments:
Post a Comment