Tuesday, December 31, 2019
One More Year of Trump
Monday, December 30, 2019
Top Ten Quotes of 2019
1. “I would like you to do us a favor, though.” — President Donald Trump, memorandum of telephone conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelenskiy, July 25.
2. “We are in the beginning of a mass extinction. And all you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth. How dare you!” — environmental activist Greta Thunberg, speech at United Nations Climate Action Summit, New York, Sept. 23.
3. “When we’re dancing with the angels, the question will be asked: ‘In 2019, what did we do to make sure we kept our democracy intact? Did we stand on the sidelines and say nothing?’” — U.S. Rep. Elijah Cummings, closing statement at public hearing of Michael Cohen before House of Representatives Oversight Committee, Feb. 27.
4. “I would rather be dead in a ditch” than ask the European Union for a delay in Brexit — U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson, remarks at police training center in Wakefield, England, Sept. 5.
5. “The Prime Minister’s advice to Her Majesty was unlawful, void and of no effect.” — Supreme Court of the United Kingdom President Brenda Hale, Baroness Hale of Richmond, judgment in case of R (Miller) v. The Prime Minister, Sept. 24.
6. “If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.” — Special Counsel Robert Mueller, remarks at the Department of Justice, May 29.
7. “I have a plan for that.” — Sen. Elizabeth Warren, remarks at “She the People” forum, Houston, April 24.
8. “Poor kids are just as bright, just as talented, as white kids.” — Presidential candidate Joe Biden, remarks to Asian and Latino Coalition, Des Moines, Iowa, Aug. 8.
9. “I’m very happy (being single). I call it being self-partnered.” — actress Emma Watson, interview in British Vogue, December 2019.
10. “It’s like a manhood thing for him. As if manhood could ever be associated with him. This wall thing." — Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, to the Democratic Caucus, January 3, 2019
2. “We are in the beginning of a mass extinction. And all you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth. How dare you!” — environmental activist Greta Thunberg, speech at United Nations Climate Action Summit, New York, Sept. 23.
3. “When we’re dancing with the angels, the question will be asked: ‘In 2019, what did we do to make sure we kept our democracy intact? Did we stand on the sidelines and say nothing?’” — U.S. Rep. Elijah Cummings, closing statement at public hearing of Michael Cohen before House of Representatives Oversight Committee, Feb. 27.
4. “I would rather be dead in a ditch” than ask the European Union for a delay in Brexit — U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson, remarks at police training center in Wakefield, England, Sept. 5.
5. “The Prime Minister’s advice to Her Majesty was unlawful, void and of no effect.” — Supreme Court of the United Kingdom President Brenda Hale, Baroness Hale of Richmond, judgment in case of R (Miller) v. The Prime Minister, Sept. 24.
6. “If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.” — Special Counsel Robert Mueller, remarks at the Department of Justice, May 29.
7. “I have a plan for that.” — Sen. Elizabeth Warren, remarks at “She the People” forum, Houston, April 24.
8. “Poor kids are just as bright, just as talented, as white kids.” — Presidential candidate Joe Biden, remarks to Asian and Latino Coalition, Des Moines, Iowa, Aug. 8.
9. “I’m very happy (being single). I call it being self-partnered.” — actress Emma Watson, interview in British Vogue, December 2019.
10. “It’s like a manhood thing for him. As if manhood could ever be associated with him. This wall thing." — Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, to the Democratic Caucus, January 3, 2019
Categories of Dudeness:
Campaign Deform,
Culture Vulture,
Donald Chump,
Hell on the Hill
Sunday, December 29, 2019
Bloomberg's History of Misogyny Coming Back to Bite Him in the Ass
News of former New York mayor
and current Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg’s
consistent sexist comments come as no surprise to many readers,
as Bloomberg has repeatedly faced allegations of sexist behavior over
the course of his career. One allegation in specific made national
headlines when Bloomberg was accused of telling an employee who
announced she was pregnant to “kill it.” The allegation arose in a discrimination lawsuit that was settled outside of court with an undisclosed amount.
According to court records reviewed by ABC News, at least 17 women have taken action against Bloomberg L.P., his privately held financial, software, data, and media company. ABC reports the company has developed a “frat-like” culture due to Bloomberg’s use of sexual comments including "I’d like to do that piece of meat," and "I would DO you in a second” (those quotes were taken from court documents). Three cases specifically blame Bloomberg for his role in the company’s culture. However, none of the cases made it to trial, ABC News reported.
Earlier this year, Bloomberg seemed to realize how his comments could affect his candidacy. He issued an apology through his spokesman in a piece for The New York Times, in which members of his team called his comments toward women wrong and disrespectful.
“Mike has come to see that some of what he has said is disrespectful and wrong,” Bloomberg spokesman Stu Loeser said in a statement last month. “He believes his words have not always aligned with his values and the way he has led his life.”
According to court records reviewed by ABC News, at least 17 women have taken action against Bloomberg L.P., his privately held financial, software, data, and media company. ABC reports the company has developed a “frat-like” culture due to Bloomberg’s use of sexual comments including "I’d like to do that piece of meat," and "I would DO you in a second” (those quotes were taken from court documents). Three cases specifically blame Bloomberg for his role in the company’s culture. However, none of the cases made it to trial, ABC News reported.
Earlier this year, Bloomberg seemed to realize how his comments could affect his candidacy. He issued an apology through his spokesman in a piece for The New York Times, in which members of his team called his comments toward women wrong and disrespectful.
“Mike has come to see that some of what he has said is disrespectful and wrong,” Bloomberg spokesman Stu Loeser said in a statement last month. “He believes his words have not always aligned with his values and the way he has led his life.”
Categories of Dudeness:
Campaign Deform,
Gender Offender
Saturday, December 28, 2019
Trump Sticks It To Puerto Rico Yet Again
Congress was all set to do something bipartisan to help people in Puerto Rico … and then Donald Trump got wind of it and insisted it dial it back.
Republicans and Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate Finance Committee had negotiated $12 billion in Medicaid funding over four years for Puerto Rico as part of the government spending package that passed last week. Politico reports, though, that Trump wasn’t having it. He said that was too much—for Puerto Rico, anyway, which he clearly doesn’t believe is really part of the United States—and forced Congress to cut the aid down to two years and $5.7 billion.
According to a White House spokesperson, it’s a “win for President Trump and the American people.” Because, again, Trump doesn’t believe that Puerto Ricans count as part of the American people, despite their citizenship. In reality, the effect is that, “With another funding cliff looming in two years under the new agreement, Puerto Rico may continue to lack the certainty it needs to commit to long-term increases of its very low payment rates to health care providers to stem their alarming exodus to the mainland, to provide coverage for such key health treatments as drugs to treat Hepatitis C, and to cover more poor, uninsured residents,” according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities’ Robert Greenstein.
By contrast, Trump's farm bailout (due to his trade war with China) has hit $28 billion-- more than double the 2009 auto bailout.
Categories of Dudeness:
Donald Chump,
Hate: It's All the Rage,
Injustice For All
Friday, December 27, 2019
Somebody Else Decorates the Mantle Next Year
Thursday, December 26, 2019
Trump Helps Putin by Attacking New Russian Sanctions
Trump is saying he’s getting tougher on Russia. But the reality is that he's working to make it easier on Russia-- by destroying a new round of sanctions and keep Vladimir Putin’s international crime syndicate open for business.
We all know that lying comes as naturally to Donald Trump as breathing in air. So no matter how often Trump tosses out claims about how “tough” he is being on Russia, it should not be surprising when The Daily Beast reported that Trump is attacking a package of sanctions against Russia. In fact, Trump’s State Department put together a 22-page letter that pushes back against every item in the package. In particular, the White House is arguing against regulations on Russian banks and Russian energy companies because watching them would somehow “cripple the international energy market” to place limits on companies controlled by sanctioned Russian oligarchs. In reality, most experts believe that new regulations would make the use of Russian banks and energy companies as pipelines for the movement of stolen wealth more difficult.
And guess who is supporting Trump on both the sanctions and the impeachment? As CNN reported, Vladimir Putin backed up Trump, saying that the impeachment in the House of Representatives was based on “made up reasons.” Trump supports Putin. Putin supports Trump. You scratch my back, and I'll scratch yours.
Categories of Dudeness:
Donald Chump,
Not on the Evening News,
Stalin Callin'
Wednesday, December 25, 2019
Keeping It Real on Christmas
Tuesday, December 24, 2019
Monday, December 23, 2019
Trump Negligence Further Cripples Defense, State Departments
While much of the nation has been
focused on impeachment, Team Trump’s capacity for bungling absolutely
everything else remains undiminished. Last week, we saw five
new high-level resignations inside the Department of Defense-- the
latest being senior adviser for international cooperation Tina Kaidanow, who left last Monday.
Other departures include top Asia policy chief Randall Schriver and
Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence Kari Bingen.
Under Trump, being an expert in policy, intelligence, or anything else means holding a tenuous position at best, and being in the federal government as a gaggle of possibly criminal idiots (Giuliani, e.g.) wreck much of what you've been working on over the course of your career has got to be soul-crushing from week one—let alone how bad it has to be in year three.
The net result is that, as in the State Department, the ranks of top Pentagon officials have been dwindling. Over a quarter of all Senate-confirmed defense positions are now vacant, and there seems little chance that most of those will be filled before the November 2020 election because (1) Team Trump has no need for policy experts to begin with, and (2) few sane people would agree to sign up for top positions in the last year of a maybe-survives-impeachment, maybe-doesn't administration now famous for ignoring and belittling its own top experts—when Trump isn't tweeting demands that they be thrown in jail on a whim.
So we're a wee bit screwed, for the time being. The State and Defense departments are both nonentities, from a policy standpoint, their recommendations ignored as the White House instead goes off on whatever tangent the Orangeman demands on any particular morning (buying Greenland; demanding the removal of all Americans from South Korea). And that will continue while the departments attempt to rebuild themselves after Team Trump's intentional neglect.
You could easily make the case that Trump should be impeached simply for incompetence: Time and time again, his White House team has proved itself incapable of staffing the government, of formulating any policy that lasts longer than a Fox News commercial break, or of keeping itself from breaking U.S. laws.
Under Trump, being an expert in policy, intelligence, or anything else means holding a tenuous position at best, and being in the federal government as a gaggle of possibly criminal idiots (Giuliani, e.g.) wreck much of what you've been working on over the course of your career has got to be soul-crushing from week one—let alone how bad it has to be in year three.
The net result is that, as in the State Department, the ranks of top Pentagon officials have been dwindling. Over a quarter of all Senate-confirmed defense positions are now vacant, and there seems little chance that most of those will be filled before the November 2020 election because (1) Team Trump has no need for policy experts to begin with, and (2) few sane people would agree to sign up for top positions in the last year of a maybe-survives-impeachment, maybe-doesn't administration now famous for ignoring and belittling its own top experts—when Trump isn't tweeting demands that they be thrown in jail on a whim.
So we're a wee bit screwed, for the time being. The State and Defense departments are both nonentities, from a policy standpoint, their recommendations ignored as the White House instead goes off on whatever tangent the Orangeman demands on any particular morning (buying Greenland; demanding the removal of all Americans from South Korea). And that will continue while the departments attempt to rebuild themselves after Team Trump's intentional neglect.
You could easily make the case that Trump should be impeached simply for incompetence: Time and time again, his White House team has proved itself incapable of staffing the government, of formulating any policy that lasts longer than a Fox News commercial break, or of keeping itself from breaking U.S. laws.
Categories of Dudeness:
Donald Chump,
Not on the Evening News,
Red Tape Diaries
Sunday, December 22, 2019
Holiday Geometry
Saturday, December 21, 2019
A Single Fracking Well Generates Massive Methane Leak
A study on methane “super emitters” has revealed
something about the scope of the environmental threat represented by
Donald Trump’s refusal to regulate methane release at wells. Not only
are these sources making a significant and often unrecognized
contribution to the climate crisis, but they can be difficult to find.
Methane is invisible and, without the mercaptan added by utility
companies to give gas its distinctive stink, even high levels of the gas
can be odorless. Even when a satellite or plane identifies high methane
in an area, pinpointing a specific well or storage facility is almost
impossible without the kind of monitoring devices that the Trump
Environmental Protection Agency is trying to eliminate.
Or it is almost impossible most of the time. A brand-new paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences shows an example of a single well venting methane in a way that was not only highly visible, but almost unbelievable. As in, this single well released more methane in three weeks than most entire nations do in a year. So much methane that this single well, venting over a period of about 20 days, may have been a significant contributor to altering the climate.
This particular super-duper emitter came from a fracking well in Ohio that blew during development in 2018. The emissions from the well were so strong that they became almost immediately visible to the Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument aboard the orbiting Sentinel-5P satellite. What that instrument saw indicated that the well was producing between 100 and 160 tons of methane every hour. The satellite doesn’t have information for the full period, but if that rate continued over the 20 days before the well was capped, one Ohio blowout released more methane into the atmosphere over that period than either Germany or the U.K. released during all of 2018.
And this staggering, potentially world-altering in a very literal way event went more or less unnoticed. If it weren’t for the new instrument, and images taken both before and during the venting event, there would have been no way to quantify just how horrible a single well blowout can be, and how significant these events really are when compared to the amount of methane lost from pipelines, tanks, and in normal use.
The authors of the paper use this incident to point out the effectiveness of their space-based instrument, and it certainly is effective. But it also reinforces the need to maintain monitors on each well, and to recognize the fantastic threat generated through fracking by levying massive penalties against companies who fail to regulate emissions.
Or it is almost impossible most of the time. A brand-new paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences shows an example of a single well venting methane in a way that was not only highly visible, but almost unbelievable. As in, this single well released more methane in three weeks than most entire nations do in a year. So much methane that this single well, venting over a period of about 20 days, may have been a significant contributor to altering the climate.
This particular super-duper emitter came from a fracking well in Ohio that blew during development in 2018. The emissions from the well were so strong that they became almost immediately visible to the Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument aboard the orbiting Sentinel-5P satellite. What that instrument saw indicated that the well was producing between 100 and 160 tons of methane every hour. The satellite doesn’t have information for the full period, but if that rate continued over the 20 days before the well was capped, one Ohio blowout released more methane into the atmosphere over that period than either Germany or the U.K. released during all of 2018.
And this staggering, potentially world-altering in a very literal way event went more or less unnoticed. If it weren’t for the new instrument, and images taken both before and during the venting event, there would have been no way to quantify just how horrible a single well blowout can be, and how significant these events really are when compared to the amount of methane lost from pipelines, tanks, and in normal use.
The authors of the paper use this incident to point out the effectiveness of their space-based instrument, and it certainly is effective. But it also reinforces the need to maintain monitors on each well, and to recognize the fantastic threat generated through fracking by levying massive penalties against companies who fail to regulate emissions.
Categories of Dudeness:
Not on the Evening News,
Revolution Earth
Friday, December 20, 2019
Fat Joe and Dr. Dre - Lord Above
Thursday, December 19, 2019
Tis The Season!
Categories of Dudeness:
Criminal Minds,
Donald Chump
Wednesday, December 18, 2019
Star Wars Christmas
Categories of Dudeness:
Culture Vulture,
Gut Busters
Tuesday, December 17, 2019
Iraqi Protests Result In Tragedy
The anti-government protests that have shaken Iraq for months took a brutal turn when protesters lynched a 16-year-old boy who had fired a pistol in the air to try to shoo them away from his family’s home. The protesters stabbed him 17 times, hung him by his ankles from a traffic light pole and cut his throat. In videos of the scene, people in police uniforms can be seen in the midst of the mob, seemingly allowing the attack to take place.
The rare outburst of violence by the protesters underscored the increasing tension on the streets after the killing of more than 400 protesters by government forces and a recent spate of attacks by other groups, while the absence of a response by either the police or bystanders, many of whom recorded the killing on their cellphones, raised questions about the complicity of Iraqi society.
The Iraqi High Commission for Human Rights condemned the police behavior as well as the lack of any effort by citizens to stop the violence. “The presence of hundreds if not thousands of citizens who stood still, filming and watching is a dangerous development that confirms the society’s acceptance of violence,” said Ali al-Bayati, a commission member.
The protests have been driven by anger over political corruption, unemployment and Iranian influence in Iraqi politics. The protests forced Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi to resign last month, and the government has struggled to respond to the protesters’ demands.
The lynching victim, identified as Haitham Ali Ismael, had been berating protesters for three days for obstructing the street beside his house and making noise, but he had been largely ignored. To get their attention, he climbed onto the roof of his house and began shooting into the air with a pistol.
The protesters, apparently under the impression that he had killed someone, stormed his house, joined by a large number of unemployed people and children who looked as if they were barely adolescents. In video of the attack, the crowd can be heard chanting, “The blood of the martyrs will not be spilled in vain,” suggesting that they believed he had killed one or more protesters.
The crowd barged into the small house at the edge of Al Wathba Square, where Ismael lived with his mother, and began stabbing him. The protesters took him outside, pulling off his clothes and dragging him bleeding through the streets.
“I was standing there when they hung this young man by a rope and tied him to the pole,” said 25-year-old Fadhil Muhammad, a tuk-tuk driver. “Then the rope was cut and the victim’s head fell on screws on the ground in the street and they entered into his head.” Then they threw the boy on the bed of a police pickup truck, Muhammad said, “and in front of the police they began to slash his neck.”
“Unfortunately Haitham had been fighting with these guys for three days because of their shouting and gathering near his house, but I did not expect it to reach to the point of killing him,” Muhammad said. “He was still a young man.”
Abu Mohammad Alkinani, 45, a fruit and vegetable seller, said he knew the boy and had “never heard anything bad” about him. “It was a painful scene, may God help his mother, and I wonder why the police did not do anything,” Alkinani said. “Maybe tomorrow this thing could happen with me and no one would help me.”
The leaders of the protest in Tahrir Square, the center of the protest movement, quickly distanced themselves from the attack and called for the perpetrators to be brought to justice. “We went out peacefully for reforms and to stop the bloodshed and to put criminals in the hand of the judiciary,” they said in a statement released on social media. “What happened today at Al Wathba Square is a crime condemned by the demonstrators and condemned by humanity and punishable by law,” the statement said.
In videos, Iraqi police officers can be seen hurrying through the square as if they were disturbed by what was going on but perhaps afraid to interfere. A police leader from the area, who asked not to be identified because he was not authorized to speak to the news media, expressed a sense of powerlessness. The attackers were slashing the boy’s throat while he was in the police truck, he said, and there was little the police could do.
The rare outburst of violence by the protesters underscored the increasing tension on the streets after the killing of more than 400 protesters by government forces and a recent spate of attacks by other groups, while the absence of a response by either the police or bystanders, many of whom recorded the killing on their cellphones, raised questions about the complicity of Iraqi society.
The Iraqi High Commission for Human Rights condemned the police behavior as well as the lack of any effort by citizens to stop the violence. “The presence of hundreds if not thousands of citizens who stood still, filming and watching is a dangerous development that confirms the society’s acceptance of violence,” said Ali al-Bayati, a commission member.
The protests have been driven by anger over political corruption, unemployment and Iranian influence in Iraqi politics. The protests forced Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi to resign last month, and the government has struggled to respond to the protesters’ demands.
The lynching victim, identified as Haitham Ali Ismael, had been berating protesters for three days for obstructing the street beside his house and making noise, but he had been largely ignored. To get their attention, he climbed onto the roof of his house and began shooting into the air with a pistol.
The protesters, apparently under the impression that he had killed someone, stormed his house, joined by a large number of unemployed people and children who looked as if they were barely adolescents. In video of the attack, the crowd can be heard chanting, “The blood of the martyrs will not be spilled in vain,” suggesting that they believed he had killed one or more protesters.
The crowd barged into the small house at the edge of Al Wathba Square, where Ismael lived with his mother, and began stabbing him. The protesters took him outside, pulling off his clothes and dragging him bleeding through the streets.
“I was standing there when they hung this young man by a rope and tied him to the pole,” said 25-year-old Fadhil Muhammad, a tuk-tuk driver. “Then the rope was cut and the victim’s head fell on screws on the ground in the street and they entered into his head.” Then they threw the boy on the bed of a police pickup truck, Muhammad said, “and in front of the police they began to slash his neck.”
“Unfortunately Haitham had been fighting with these guys for three days because of their shouting and gathering near his house, but I did not expect it to reach to the point of killing him,” Muhammad said. “He was still a young man.”
Abu Mohammad Alkinani, 45, a fruit and vegetable seller, said he knew the boy and had “never heard anything bad” about him. “It was a painful scene, may God help his mother, and I wonder why the police did not do anything,” Alkinani said. “Maybe tomorrow this thing could happen with me and no one would help me.”
The leaders of the protest in Tahrir Square, the center of the protest movement, quickly distanced themselves from the attack and called for the perpetrators to be brought to justice. “We went out peacefully for reforms and to stop the bloodshed and to put criminals in the hand of the judiciary,” they said in a statement released on social media. “What happened today at Al Wathba Square is a crime condemned by the demonstrators and condemned by humanity and punishable by law,” the statement said.
In videos, Iraqi police officers can be seen hurrying through the square as if they were disturbed by what was going on but perhaps afraid to interfere. A police leader from the area, who asked not to be identified because he was not authorized to speak to the news media, expressed a sense of powerlessness. The attackers were slashing the boy’s throat while he was in the police truck, he said, and there was little the police could do.
Categories of Dudeness:
Not on the Evening News,
Riddle East
Monday, December 16, 2019
Keep It Real, Barack
If women ran every country in the world there would be a general improvement in living standards and outcomes, former U.S. President Barack Obama has said.
Speaking in Singapore, he said women aren't perfect, but are "indisputably better" than men. He said most of the problems in the world came from old people, mostly men, holding onto positions of power.
"Now women, I just want you to know; you are not perfect, but what I can say pretty indisputably is that you're better than us [men]. I'm absolutely confident that for two years if every nation on earth was run by women, you would see a significant improvement across the board on just about everything... living standards and outcomes."
When asked if he would ever consider going back into political leadership, he said he believed in leaders stepping aside when the time came. "If you look at the world and look at the problems it's usually old people, usually old men, not getting out of the way," he said.
"It is important for political leaders to try and remind themselves that you are there to do a job, but you are not there for life, you are not there in order to prop up your own sense of self importance or your own power."
Speaking in Singapore, he said women aren't perfect, but are "indisputably better" than men. He said most of the problems in the world came from old people, mostly men, holding onto positions of power.
"Now women, I just want you to know; you are not perfect, but what I can say pretty indisputably is that you're better than us [men]. I'm absolutely confident that for two years if every nation on earth was run by women, you would see a significant improvement across the board on just about everything... living standards and outcomes."
When asked if he would ever consider going back into political leadership, he said he believed in leaders stepping aside when the time came. "If you look at the world and look at the problems it's usually old people, usually old men, not getting out of the way," he said.
"It is important for political leaders to try and remind themselves that you are there to do a job, but you are not there for life, you are not there in order to prop up your own sense of self importance or your own power."
Sunday, December 15, 2019
Hallmark of Bigotry
The Hallmark Channel pulled four commercials from wedding-planning site
Zola that featured a lesbian wedding, but continued to run similar ads
featuring heterosexual couples. Now Zola is fighting back—saying
Hallmark won’t be getting any more of its ad dollars.“ All kisses,
couples and marriages are equal celebrations of love and we will no
longer be advertising on Hallmark,” Zola said in a statement. Hallmark
said it pulled the same-sex spots because the debate over them “was
distracting from the purpose of our network, which is to provide
entertainment value.”
The move to pull the ads comes following complaints by One Million Moms, a division of the conservative American Family Association, which has been designated an anti-LGBT hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
A open message to Hallmark posted on the American Family Association's website said, "Such content “goes against Christian and conservative values. You will lose viewers if you cave to the LBGT agenda.” The site later posted an update that the CEO of Crown Media Family Networks, (which owns the Hallmark Channel) confirmed in a phone call that the Hallmark Channel will “continue to be a safe and family friendly network. Praise the Lord,” the statement added.
Response on Twitter was harsh, and many users urged a boycott of the Hallmark Channel:
The move to pull the ads comes following complaints by One Million Moms, a division of the conservative American Family Association, which has been designated an anti-LGBT hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
A open message to Hallmark posted on the American Family Association's website said, "Such content “goes against Christian and conservative values. You will lose viewers if you cave to the LBGT agenda.” The site later posted an update that the CEO of Crown Media Family Networks, (which owns the Hallmark Channel) confirmed in a phone call that the Hallmark Channel will “continue to be a safe and family friendly network. Praise the Lord,” the statement added.
Response on Twitter was harsh, and many users urged a boycott of the Hallmark Channel:
Categories of Dudeness:
Church of the Poisoned Mind,
Hate: It's All the Rage
Saturday, December 14, 2019
Holiday Ho Ho Ho
Friday, December 13, 2019
Lizzo - Good As Hell
Thursday, December 12, 2019
Trump To Put A Beatdown on Homeless People
Ever since the Trump administration forced Matthew Doherty, Obama's director of the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness (USICH), to resign, they have been looking for someone to lead a crackdown on homelessness. Well, it now seems that Robert Marbut, a former community college civics professor and San Antonio City Council member, is the best candidate for that job.
Marbut has touted the belief that homelessness is caused by behavior and that providing services on the street such as food and supplies encourages vagrancy; he has done so in his role as a policy consultant for cities including Key West and St. Petersburg in Florida; Fresno, California; and San Antonio, Texas. Marbut calls providing food and supplies to people outside of shelters "street feeding" and says that most panhandlers are not actually homeless but instead are grifters who rely "on the good nature of citizens to get tax-free dollars." Marbut recommends shelters that are open all day but that harshly punish rule-breaking.
A shelter in St. Petersburg using his plan had a success rate of 7% of residents obtaining permanent housing within two years. More than 80% of residents either just left the shelter or were kicked out for breaking rules, including things like poor hygiene. A former resident of that Florida shelter, Marcus Franklin, told HuffPost that residents were forced to sleep outside when beds were full, even during storms. "That whole area’s flooded and you still got to sleep out there," he said. He described metal tents erected for "housing" residents, saying, "Those things have no sides on 'em. The water's still hitting you. You're soaking wet."
"His approach is literally to have people sleeping on mats in a shelter courtyard and to call that ending homelessness," Diane Yentel, president of the National Low Income Housing Coalition, told Mother Jones. "It's absurd." She says that Marbut talks about homelessness "like it's a personal flaw. [...] He dismisses the clear structural challenges of a lack of affordable housing that exacerbate homelessness."
Categories of Dudeness:
Donald Chump,
Injustice For All
Wednesday, December 11, 2019
"Top Cop" William Barr Going Off the Deep End
What has become clear in recent weeks is that Attorney General Barr has become another of Donald Trump’s personal lawyers, serving the president first and the country second, if at all.
Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz had barely issued his report clearing the FBI of bias in its investigation of Russian interference in the Trump campaign/election before Barr was out and about, contradicting it, just like he did pre-damage control on Robert Mueller’s report. According to Barr, the Horowitz report "now makes clear that the FBI launched an intrusive investigation of a U.S. presidential campaign on the thinnest of suspicions that, in my view, were insufficient to justify the steps taken.”
The 476-page report made no such thing clear. Quite the opposite. Horowitz squashed a thousand conspiracy theories about the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane that have been idiotically cultivated by the president and his defenders. The OIG’s main finding was that the inquiry started “in compliance with Department and FBI policies with no political bias,” and had “an authorized investigative purpose.” It did not rely on materials from the infamous Christopher Steele dossier until AFTER the investigation had already been opened. There were procedural issues with the application for a FISA warrant, which the FBI will correct. But no information derived from the warrant was actually used. A low-level agent who didn’t follow procedures is gone. And there was no spying on the Trump campaign. But that doesn't stop Barr from his alternative-reality bullshit.
Before Barr's mis-characterization of the OIG report, there was his Notre Dame speech in October, where Barr denounced liberalism and secularism and warned that “militant secularists” were out to destroy America’s “moral order” with rhetoric that would have fit right in at Nuremberg.
Then, last week, came that shocking (and not much shocks anymore, but this one really did) speech about how the police just might stop protecting communities that didn’t show them the proper respect. The American people, he said, “have to start showing, more than they do, the respect and support that law enforcement deserves. And if communities don’t give that support and respect, they might find themselves without the police protection they need.”
To hear the nation's top law enforcement official say that certain people in the country won't get full protection of the law is scary-- something right out of the fascist playbook.
Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz had barely issued his report clearing the FBI of bias in its investigation of Russian interference in the Trump campaign/election before Barr was out and about, contradicting it, just like he did pre-damage control on Robert Mueller’s report. According to Barr, the Horowitz report "now makes clear that the FBI launched an intrusive investigation of a U.S. presidential campaign on the thinnest of suspicions that, in my view, were insufficient to justify the steps taken.”
The 476-page report made no such thing clear. Quite the opposite. Horowitz squashed a thousand conspiracy theories about the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane that have been idiotically cultivated by the president and his defenders. The OIG’s main finding was that the inquiry started “in compliance with Department and FBI policies with no political bias,” and had “an authorized investigative purpose.” It did not rely on materials from the infamous Christopher Steele dossier until AFTER the investigation had already been opened. There were procedural issues with the application for a FISA warrant, which the FBI will correct. But no information derived from the warrant was actually used. A low-level agent who didn’t follow procedures is gone. And there was no spying on the Trump campaign. But that doesn't stop Barr from his alternative-reality bullshit.
Before Barr's mis-characterization of the OIG report, there was his Notre Dame speech in October, where Barr denounced liberalism and secularism and warned that “militant secularists” were out to destroy America’s “moral order” with rhetoric that would have fit right in at Nuremberg.
Then, last week, came that shocking (and not much shocks anymore, but this one really did) speech about how the police just might stop protecting communities that didn’t show them the proper respect. The American people, he said, “have to start showing, more than they do, the respect and support that law enforcement deserves. And if communities don’t give that support and respect, they might find themselves without the police protection they need.”
To hear the nation's top law enforcement official say that certain people in the country won't get full protection of the law is scary-- something right out of the fascist playbook.
Categories of Dudeness:
Big Bad Brother,
Donald Chump,
Injustice For All
Tuesday, December 10, 2019
FBI OIG Shoots Down Trump's Bullshit
The Justice Department’s inspector general has released his report on the FBI’s investigation of the 2016 Trump campaign, and the result is what we expected: The FBI launched its investigation into ties between the Trump campaign and Russia NOT for partisan reasons but because it had reason to investigate.
The inspector general’s report is harshly critical of the FBI’s handling of applications for a FISA wiretap on Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, however. But to be clear: There was no bias against Trump. It wasn’t a coup. There weren’t scummy “dirty cops.” The FBI didn't put undercover agents in the Trump campaign. There were no informants or spies. Trump wasn’t illegally “wire tapped” by President Obama.
Trump’s personal attorney/attorney general, William Barr, continues to insist that the FBI investigation was illegitimate, and claims that the IG’s report saying it was not politically motivated “makes clear” that Barr’s insistence on the opposite is correct.
Oh-- and one more time. The Ukranians did not hack the DNC emails-- the Russians did. The FBI did not give the servers to the Ukranians, since there were no servers. And what's the deal with flushing toilets??? Nobody flushes toilets fifteen times, for chrissakes!
The inspector general’s report is harshly critical of the FBI’s handling of applications for a FISA wiretap on Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, however. But to be clear: There was no bias against Trump. It wasn’t a coup. There weren’t scummy “dirty cops.” The FBI didn't put undercover agents in the Trump campaign. There were no informants or spies. Trump wasn’t illegally “wire tapped” by President Obama.
Trump’s personal attorney/attorney general, William Barr, continues to insist that the FBI investigation was illegitimate, and claims that the IG’s report saying it was not politically motivated “makes clear” that Barr’s insistence on the opposite is correct.
Oh-- and one more time. The Ukranians did not hack the DNC emails-- the Russians did. The FBI did not give the servers to the Ukranians, since there were no servers. And what's the deal with flushing toilets??? Nobody flushes toilets fifteen times, for chrissakes!
Monday, December 9, 2019
Hindu Nationalist Government in India Continues to Instituionalize Religious Discrimination
India's government has introduced a controversial bill which offers amnesty to non-Muslim illegal immigrants from three neighboring countries. The controversial bill seeks to provide citizenship to religious minorities in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan.
The government, led by the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), says this will give sanctuary to people fleeing religious persecution. Critics say the bill is part of a BJP agenda to marginalize Muslims.
The Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB) has already prompted widespread protests in the northeast region of the country which borders Bangladesh, as people there feel that they will be "overrun" by immigrants from across the border.
The CAB amends the 64-year-old Indian Citizenship law, which currently prohibits illegal migrants from becoming Indian citizens. Under the amended version of the law, there will be an exception for members of six religious minority communities - Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi and Christian - if they can prove that they are from Pakistan, Afghanistan or Bangladesh. They will only have to live or work in India for six years to be eligible for citizenship by naturalization, the process by which a non-citizen acquires the citizenship or nationality of that country.
Opponents of the bill say it is exclusionary and violates the secular principles enshrined in the constitution. They say faith cannot be made a condition of citizenship. The constitution prohibits religious discrimination against its citizens, and guarantees all persons equality before the law and equal protection of the law.
Delhi-based lawyer Gautam Bhatia says that by dividing alleged migrants into Muslims and non-Muslims, the bill "explicitly and blatantly, seeks to enshrine religious discrimination into law, contrary to our long-standing, secular constitutional ethos".
Historian Mukul Kesavan says the bill is "couched in the language of refuge and seemingly directed at foreigners, but its main purpose is the delegitimization of Muslims citizenship".
Critics say that if it is genuinely aimed at protecting minorities, the bill should have have included Muslim religious minorities who have faced persecution in their own countries - Ahmadis in Pakistan and Rohingyas in Myanmar, for example. (The government has gone to the Supreme Court seeking deportation of Rohingya refugees from India.)
The government, led by the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), says this will give sanctuary to people fleeing religious persecution. Critics say the bill is part of a BJP agenda to marginalize Muslims.
The Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB) has already prompted widespread protests in the northeast region of the country which borders Bangladesh, as people there feel that they will be "overrun" by immigrants from across the border.
The CAB amends the 64-year-old Indian Citizenship law, which currently prohibits illegal migrants from becoming Indian citizens. Under the amended version of the law, there will be an exception for members of six religious minority communities - Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi and Christian - if they can prove that they are from Pakistan, Afghanistan or Bangladesh. They will only have to live or work in India for six years to be eligible for citizenship by naturalization, the process by which a non-citizen acquires the citizenship or nationality of that country.
Opponents of the bill say it is exclusionary and violates the secular principles enshrined in the constitution. They say faith cannot be made a condition of citizenship. The constitution prohibits religious discrimination against its citizens, and guarantees all persons equality before the law and equal protection of the law.
Delhi-based lawyer Gautam Bhatia says that by dividing alleged migrants into Muslims and non-Muslims, the bill "explicitly and blatantly, seeks to enshrine religious discrimination into law, contrary to our long-standing, secular constitutional ethos".
Historian Mukul Kesavan says the bill is "couched in the language of refuge and seemingly directed at foreigners, but its main purpose is the delegitimization of Muslims citizenship".
Critics say that if it is genuinely aimed at protecting minorities, the bill should have have included Muslim religious minorities who have faced persecution in their own countries - Ahmadis in Pakistan and Rohingyas in Myanmar, for example. (The government has gone to the Supreme Court seeking deportation of Rohingya refugees from India.)
Categories of Dudeness:
Church of the Poisoned Mind,
Heart of the Ganges,
Injustice For All
Sunday, December 8, 2019
India Rape Victim Set on Fire on Her Way to Court
A 23-year-old alleged rape victim is fighting for her life after she was set on fire while going to court in northern India. The woman was on her way to a hearing in the case she filed against two men in March, in Uttar Pradesh.
She is in critical condition in hospital, where she is being treated for severe burns. Five men including two of her alleged rapists have been arrested on suspicion of setting her on fire, police say.
The woman was on her way to a train station when a group of men assaulted her and dragged her to a nearby field, where they set her on fire, according to reports in local media.
The incident occurred in Unnao district, which was recently in the news over another rape case. Police opened a murder investigation against a ruling party lawmaker in July after a woman who accused him of rape was seriously injured in a car crash. Two of her aunts were killed and her lawyer was injured.
This latest incident has sparked widespread outrage in India, which is still reeling under a shocking murder and rape case that grabbed headlines just under a week ago. In that case, A 27-year-old vet in the southern city of Hyderabad was raped and set on fire. Protests were held across the country after the victim's charred remains were found following her disappearance last week.
Rape and sexual violence against women have been in focus in India since the December 2012 gang-rape and murder of a young woman on a bus in the capital, Delhi. But there has been no sign that crimes against women are abating. According to the latest government crime figures, police registered 33,658 cases of rape in India in 2017 - that's an average of 92 rapes every day.
She is in critical condition in hospital, where she is being treated for severe burns. Five men including two of her alleged rapists have been arrested on suspicion of setting her on fire, police say.
The woman was on her way to a train station when a group of men assaulted her and dragged her to a nearby field, where they set her on fire, according to reports in local media.
The incident occurred in Unnao district, which was recently in the news over another rape case. Police opened a murder investigation against a ruling party lawmaker in July after a woman who accused him of rape was seriously injured in a car crash. Two of her aunts were killed and her lawyer was injured.
This latest incident has sparked widespread outrage in India, which is still reeling under a shocking murder and rape case that grabbed headlines just under a week ago. In that case, A 27-year-old vet in the southern city of Hyderabad was raped and set on fire. Protests were held across the country after the victim's charred remains were found following her disappearance last week.
Rape and sexual violence against women have been in focus in India since the December 2012 gang-rape and murder of a young woman on a bus in the capital, Delhi. But there has been no sign that crimes against women are abating. According to the latest government crime figures, police registered 33,658 cases of rape in India in 2017 - that's an average of 92 rapes every day.
Categories of Dudeness:
Gender Offender,
Heart of the Ganges,
Injustice For All
Saturday, December 7, 2019
Iowa's Joni Ernts Secretly Plans to Gut Social Security
An activist group called Social Security Work parked the billboard above in front of Senator Joni Ernst's office this week and plans to have it travel around the state the entire month. "When Joni Ernst says she wants to address Social Security behind closed doors, she is speaking in code to Wall Street donors," said Linda Benesch, Social Security Works communications director, in an email. "The only reason to act in secret is to overthrow the will of the American people by cutting earned benefits. Our mobile billboard exposes Ernst's real plans."
The reference is to comments Ernst made back in September at a town meeting. Ernst said that lawmakers need to "fix" Social Security "behind closed doors," where they can "just have an open and honest conversation about what are some of the ideas that we have for maintaining Social Security in the future."
Open and honest-- but with the American people shut out of the conversation. Which is how all Republicans want to destroy the program—behind closed doors, with no one person’s fingerprints on the weapon.
Categories of Dudeness:
Gee-Oh Pee,
Not on the Evening News
Friday, December 6, 2019
Rod Wave - Cuban Links
Thursday, December 5, 2019
Trump Embarrassed Yet Again in Front of World Leaders
Trump was made to look foolish yet again on the world stage in front of world leaders at the London NATO summit. Footage began circulating that showed Trudeau, UK PM Boris Johnson and French leader Emmanuel Macron mocking Trump over his impromptu press conference which resulted in him being late to a meeting with the French president.
The brief video posted on Twitter by Canada's public broadcaster, CBC, showed Trudeau gossiping with a group of leaders, including Johnson, Macron, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, and Queen Elizabeth's daughter Princess Anne at Buckingham Palace.
At the start of the footage, Johnson asked Macron: "Is that why you were late?" Trudeau then interjects: "He was late because he takes a 40-minute press conference off the top." An amused Trudeau later jokes, "Oh yeah, yeah . . . you just watched his team's jaw drop to the floor."
Trump had already been embarrassed by Macron the previous day when the French president called Trump out on his bullshit in front of a group of reporters. Trump had tried to claim yet again that ISIS prisoners being held in Syria were "mostly from Europe." (an assertion has been repeatedly contradicted by Trump's own officials.) Macron corrected Trump on that point, as well as confronted him over his ridiculous assertion that ISIS has been vanquished, telling his American counterpart to “be serious”.
When the video clip of Trudeau joking about Trump with Macron and Boris Johnson began making news, Trump responded by whining that Trudeau was "two-faced' and canceling his last news conference before he furiously stormed back to the U.S.
The brief video posted on Twitter by Canada's public broadcaster, CBC, showed Trudeau gossiping with a group of leaders, including Johnson, Macron, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, and Queen Elizabeth's daughter Princess Anne at Buckingham Palace.
At the start of the footage, Johnson asked Macron: "Is that why you were late?" Trudeau then interjects: "He was late because he takes a 40-minute press conference off the top." An amused Trudeau later jokes, "Oh yeah, yeah . . . you just watched his team's jaw drop to the floor."
Trump had already been embarrassed by Macron the previous day when the French president called Trump out on his bullshit in front of a group of reporters. Trump had tried to claim yet again that ISIS prisoners being held in Syria were "mostly from Europe." (an assertion has been repeatedly contradicted by Trump's own officials.) Macron corrected Trump on that point, as well as confronted him over his ridiculous assertion that ISIS has been vanquished, telling his American counterpart to “be serious”.
When the video clip of Trudeau joking about Trump with Macron and Boris Johnson began making news, Trump responded by whining that Trudeau was "two-faced' and canceling his last news conference before he furiously stormed back to the U.S.
Categories of Dudeness:
As The World Churns,
Donald Chump
Wednesday, December 4, 2019
Oh Snap!
Kamala Harris dropped out of the presidential race, and Trump couldn't wait to troll her:
Kamala didn't lose a step:
Categories of Dudeness:
Campaign Deform,
Donald Chump
Tuesday, December 3, 2019
Trump Tax Changes Result in Reduction in Charitable Giving
A report published in June by the Giving Institute, a nonprofit that studies philanthropy, finds that charitable giving has dropped in the wake of tax code changes implemented under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. The nonprofit Marketplace reports that the near-doubling of the standard tax deduction for most Americans under the act has made itemizing deductions—formerly an incentive to donating to nonprofits—less attractive.
Marketplace notes, “Many charities have reported declines in giving since the law went into effect. In the first half of this year, fundraising revenue was down 7.3% compared to the same period last year for more than 4,000 organizations tracked by the Fundraising Effectiveness Project. And in 2018, total charitable contributions from individual Americans was down 3.4%, according to the Chronicle of Philanthropy.”
According to The Washington Post,
while charitable giving as a whole has been essentially flat since the
changes to the tax code were introduced, that fact masks the uneven
distribution of donors and recipients. Wealthier people and charitable
foundations, the paper reports, tend to give to larger, wealthier
institutions, while smaller local organizations rely on donations from
less-wealthy individuals—those who are no longer encouraged by the
prospect of itemized deductions to make donations.
Categories of Dudeness:
Donald Chump,
Not on the Evening News
Monday, December 2, 2019
Katy Perry-Cozy Little Christmas
Sunday, December 1, 2019
Growing Outrage Over Violence Against Women in India
Outrage has continued to grow in India over the gang-rape and murder of a 27-year-old woman, with protesters taking to the streets and politicians calling for the offenders to be “lynched”.
Demonstrations spread to cities including Delhi, Bengaluru and Kolkata and MPs spoke out in parliament following the discovery last week of the woman’s burned body in Hyderabad.
Four men now in police custody are alleged to have deflated the victim's scooter tires in order to leave her stranded then approached her appearing to offer to help. It is alleged she was dragged to an abandoned area by the roadside where she was gang-raped, asphyxiated to death and her body set alight and dumped.
“This act has brought shame to the entire country, it has hurt everyone,” said the defense minister, Rajnath Singh, speaking out against what he called a “heinous crime”.
Last week multiple rapes and murders were reported, including the gang-rape and murder of a lawyer in Jharkhand and the rape and murder of a six-year-old child in Rajasthan.
Violent crimes against women have been in the spotlight in India since 2012, when the fatal gang rape of a young woman aboard a moving bus in Delhi prompted hundreds of thousands to take to the streets to demand stricter rape laws.
Outrage over the 2012 Delhi rape prompted thousands of women to take to the streets and spurred quick action on legislation, doubling prison terms for rapists to 20 years and criminalizing voyeurism, stalking and the trafficking of women. Indian MP's also voted to lower to 16 from 18 the age at which a person can be tried as an adult for heinous crimes.
Sexual violence against women remains rife in India and it is the most dangerous place in the world to be a woman, according to a 2018 survey by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.
Police in the country registered 33,658 cases of rape in 2017, according to the most recent available official records – an average of 92 a day - but the real figure is believed to be far higher as many women in India do not go to the police out of fear.
Tens of thousands of cases also remain stuck in courts, often hindering victims and their families as they navigate the slow and cumbersome legal system. Figures for 2017 reveal that courts opened 18,300 cases related to rape but more than 127,800 more remained pending at the end of the year.
Demonstrations spread to cities including Delhi, Bengaluru and Kolkata and MPs spoke out in parliament following the discovery last week of the woman’s burned body in Hyderabad.
Four men now in police custody are alleged to have deflated the victim's scooter tires in order to leave her stranded then approached her appearing to offer to help. It is alleged she was dragged to an abandoned area by the roadside where she was gang-raped, asphyxiated to death and her body set alight and dumped.
“This act has brought shame to the entire country, it has hurt everyone,” said the defense minister, Rajnath Singh, speaking out against what he called a “heinous crime”.
Last week multiple rapes and murders were reported, including the gang-rape and murder of a lawyer in Jharkhand and the rape and murder of a six-year-old child in Rajasthan.
Violent crimes against women have been in the spotlight in India since 2012, when the fatal gang rape of a young woman aboard a moving bus in Delhi prompted hundreds of thousands to take to the streets to demand stricter rape laws.
Outrage over the 2012 Delhi rape prompted thousands of women to take to the streets and spurred quick action on legislation, doubling prison terms for rapists to 20 years and criminalizing voyeurism, stalking and the trafficking of women. Indian MP's also voted to lower to 16 from 18 the age at which a person can be tried as an adult for heinous crimes.
Sexual violence against women remains rife in India and it is the most dangerous place in the world to be a woman, according to a 2018 survey by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.
Police in the country registered 33,658 cases of rape in 2017, according to the most recent available official records – an average of 92 a day - but the real figure is believed to be far higher as many women in India do not go to the police out of fear.
Tens of thousands of cases also remain stuck in courts, often hindering victims and their families as they navigate the slow and cumbersome legal system. Figures for 2017 reveal that courts opened 18,300 cases related to rape but more than 127,800 more remained pending at the end of the year.
Categories of Dudeness:
Gender Offender,
Heart of the Ganges,
Injustice For All
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)