Monday, July 9, 2007

Lawyers DO Have Morals, Just Bad Ones

A man who flunked Massachusetts’ bar exam is claiming in federal court that he failed test because he refused to answer a question related to gay marriage.

According to the Associated Press, a question on the exam concerned the rights of 2 married lesbians, their children and their property. Stephen Dunne says the question itself was "morally repugnant," because it legitimizes same-sex marriage and parenting, which he opposes. (Massachusetts legalized same-sex marriage in 2003.)

Dunne claims that the test violates his rights and targets his religious beliefs. The suit also challenges the constitutionality of same-sex marriage. He is seeking $9.75 million in damages and wants a jury to prohibit the Board of Bar Examiners from considering the question in his passage of the exam and to order it removed from all future exams. Dunne scored a 268.866 on the bar exam, just missing a passing grade of 270.

“There’s a different forum for that contemporary issue to be discussed, and it’s inappropriate to be on a professional licensing examination,” Dunne told the Boston Herald. “You don’t see questions about partial-birth abortion or abortion on there.”

While officials with the state bar and the court had no comment, Boston attorney Tom Dacey told the Herald that he doesn’t believe the case will go very far. Gay marriage is now part of the state’s domestic relation laws, and that’s one subject on which the Board of Bar Examiners traditionally tests applicants, Dacey said. “Lawyers have to answer questions about legal principles they disagree with all the time, and that doesn’t mean we’re endorsing them,” Dacey, a director of Goulston & Storrs’ litigation group, told the Herald. “You might be somebody who is morally opposed to divorce, but have to interpret the divorce laws of the commonwealth to answer a question about who property is passed to.”

No comments: